To establish itself as a world power the U. S military had to significantly expand in both wars. Not only did America 's army expand, but the countries production of goods and produce increased and flooded into international markets. America 's prestige was now affecting other nations and had great impact. Victories in both wars promoted America 's new found authority, and the countries new found self responsibility to look out for other countries.
The increase in nationalism, competition amongst European nations and having international alliances made this war a tremendous war.
S in World War I was known for being the turning point of the war. But how influential was the U. S to this World War? The United States took this chance to show the world how powerful they were.
The first indirect cause of World War I which involves nationalism would be the overall formation of Germany. Nationalism spread throughout German-speaking areas and people fought to free land from the French rule document I. Militarism is a policy of glorifying military power and keeping a standing army always prepared for war Textbook, pg For example, in Europe between and , every major power was developing a strong military presence. The list seems endless, as each generation of historical revisionists find yet another slate of candidates on which to pin blame.
Ironically, the one person who rarely is held responsible is Gavrilo Princip, the teenager whose actions on that summer day in Sarajevo precipitated the avalanche of war. The question of blame was more than an issue of historical interest. The war was incomprehensibly expensive. German reparations for civilian damages were originally estimated by the allied powers at billion gold marks.
In the Treaty of Versailles, damages were set at billion gold marks. Only 50 billion of that was expected to be paid, the so-called Schedule A and Schedule B obligations. The balance, listed separately on Schedule C, was never intended to be collected on and was included strictly for public consumption.
In dollars, billion gold marks would represent a sum of approximately seven trillion dollars. Moreover, that sum only reflected the damage done to civilian property on the Western Front. Additionally, the value had been set based on the Allies' assessment of Germany's ability to pay—an amount that was progressively reduced.
The fact is no one really knew what the total value of the damage to civilian property was. Those numbers did not take into consideration the cost of prosecuting the war by the allies. Nor did it take into consideration the cost of civilian damages on the Eastern Front, nor the costs to Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey or Russia, not to mention the smaller powers, of fighting the war as well.
Finally, there was no way of quantifying the "value" of the staggering loss of life nor the continuing costs of caring for the wounded and maimed.
The "cost" of World War I is a highly subjective measure. These figures are often cited, although it is not clear how they were determined. In reality, we will never really know what the total cost of the war actually was. Regardless of the number used, it was a staggering amount. It is a truism of military conflict that the victor writes the history. The alliance between Germany and Austria was natural. Both spoke the same language — German — and had a similar culture. In previous centuries, they had both been part of the same empire — the Holy Roman Empire.
Austria was in political trouble in the south-east of Europe — the Balkans. She needed the might of Germany to back her up if trouble got worse. Italy had joined these countries as she feared their power on her northern border.
Each member of the Triple Alliance Germany, Austria and Italy promised to help the others if they were attacked by another country. The Triple Entente was less structured than the Triple Alliance. So Austria-Hungary technically started the war, but Germany tried to finish it. For four years.
One of the biggest questions of the Revolutionary
0コメント